Blog: Is the Thomas Cook boss right to defend his high pay?
Is Peter Fankhauser, boss of now-collapsed Thomas Cook, right to defend his high pay and bonuses?
NO, says Ashley Walsh, head of policy and research at the High Pay Centre.
Thomas Cook failed because it couldn’t adapt. Despite trousering £20m between 2014 and 2018, executives failed to streamline the firm and let debts mount up.
Meanwhile, staff were stuck with pay freezes and now unpaid salaries.
Ex-chief executive Peter Fankhauser says he isn’t a fat cat, because he didn’t cash some of his share payments when Thomas Cook collapsed. That’s hardly praiseworthy. The whole point of share-based pay is that executives get them only if their businesses succeed.
Worryingly, Rachel Reeves, chair of the Business Select Committee, questioned whether the firm’s accounting practices boosted bonuses, and the business secretary referred the case to the official receiver.
Fankhauser also said his pay was appropriate for a FTSE 250 company. But Thomas Cook crashed out of the index in December.
He takes his pay back to his £2m Surrey mansion. But the workers were really the ones with skin in the game. They are left to pick up the pieces.
This blog post originally appeared in City AM.
Since 1 January 2020 the average FTSE 100 CEO has earned:
Income inequality in the UK
Wealth inequality in the UK
- Conditions are critical: publicly-funded bail-outs for private companies
Government bail-outs of large businesses affected by the coronavirus must include social and environmental conditions including fair pay, fair tax contributions and worker representation on company boards
- Purpose Beyond Profit: Where Next for Business?
WATCH IN FULL: an expert panel discuss the future of business and what action is needed to tackle climate change and reduce economic inequality
- Billionaires and poverty should not coexist
It's ludicrous to suggest that we need billionaires to incentivise work and wealth creation.