Blog: Is the Thomas Cook boss right to defend his high pay?
Is Peter Fankhauser, boss of now-collapsed Thomas Cook, right to defend his high pay and bonuses?
NO, says Ashley Walsh, head of policy and research at the High Pay Centre.
Thomas Cook failed because it couldn’t adapt. Despite trousering £20m between 2014 and 2018, executives failed to streamline the firm and let debts mount up.
Meanwhile, staff were stuck with pay freezes and now unpaid salaries.
Ex-chief executive Peter Fankhauser says he isn’t a fat cat, because he didn’t cash some of his share payments when Thomas Cook collapsed. That’s hardly praiseworthy. The whole point of share-based pay is that executives get them only if their businesses succeed.
Worryingly, Rachel Reeves, chair of the Business Select Committee, questioned whether the firm’s accounting practices boosted bonuses, and the business secretary referred the case to the official receiver.
Fankhauser also said his pay was appropriate for a FTSE 250 company. But Thomas Cook crashed out of the index in December.
He takes his pay back to his £2m Surrey mansion. But the workers were really the ones with skin in the game. They are left to pick up the pieces.
This blog post originally appeared in City AM.
Since 1 January 2020 the average FTSE 100 CEO has earned:
Income inequality in the UK
Wealth inequality in the UK
- High Pay Day 2020: Scope for fairer pay and lower inequality remains considerable
Pay for the typical FTSE 100 CEO in 2020 has already surpassed the amount the average UK worker earns in an entire year. We can do much more to achieve a better balance between those at the top and everybody else
- Work for HPC - applications for a Researcher now open!
We're recruiting! Find out how to apply here
- High Pay Centre briefing: regional economies across the EU
The UK's poorest regions are falling behind the rest of Europe