Blog: Should the tapered annual allowance for tax on pensions be abolished?
Should the tapered annual allowance for tax on pensions be abolished?
No – Luke Hildyard is director of the High Pay Centre.
Calls to scrap the pensions allowance taper are hopelessly naive and completely out of touch.
There is considerable bleating about the complexity of the taper, but it is essentially pretty simple. For the very rich, tax relief on pension contributions diminishes as they earn more, but by less than the increase in earnings so that there is still an incentive to work. Anyone affected is comfortably inside the richest one per cent of UK earners.
Much of the focus has been on how this system might affect high-paid doctors. But back in the real world, the NHS struggles to meet the needs of an ageing population; schools and social services count the cost of repeated funding cuts; youth services and policing cry out for investment with knife crime on the rise.
Scrapping the taper and the millions of pounds of tax it brings in would make these crises even more acute, while benefiting only the very rich. We are already among the countries with the worst inequality and lowest spending on public services in Europe. Worsening these unenviable records is a terrible idea.
This blog post originally appeared in City AM.
Since 1 January 2020 the average FTSE 100 CEO has earned:
Income inequality in the UK
Wealth inequality in the UK
- High Pay Day 2020: Scope for fairer pay and lower inequality remains considerable
Pay for the typical FTSE 100 CEO in 2020 has already surpassed the amount the average UK worker earns in an entire year. We can do much more to achieve a better balance between those at the top and everybody else
- Work for HPC - applications for a Researcher now open!
We're recruiting! Find out how to apply here
- High Pay Centre briefing: regional economies across the EU
The UK's poorest regions are falling behind the rest of Europe