HPC responds to Select Committee Inquiry on Executive Pay
Our response highlights the limited progress of reforms recommended by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Select Committee
We have responded to the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Select Committee's Inquiry on Executive Pay. Our response highlights the lack of progress made in relation to recommendations made in the Committee's 2017 report.
For example, there are still very few companies who align their bonuses with broader corporate responsibilities (relating to their social or environmental impact, for example), as opposed to financial or operational metrics. Vast Long-Term Incentive Payments (LTIPs) are still the prevailing method for paying executives, despite the growing evidence that performance-related executive pay is not particularly effective and that much smaller 'restricted share' awards would be a better form of reward.
The response also argues that remuneration committees and institutional investors are failing to hold companies to account over their pay practices, and recommends greater say for workers in the pay-setting process.
Since 1 January 2019 the average FTSE 100 CEO has earned:
Income inequality in the UK
Wealth inequality in the UK
- How the Shareholder first business model contributes to poverty, inequality and climate change
new briefing from the High Pay Centre and the TUC
- Maximum Pay Ratios
HPC Director Luke Hildyard's essay published by Autonomy and Verso in 'The New Economy Starter Pack'. Why it's time to rethink income, not just at the bottom of the ladder, but at the top too.
- Blog: We have to stop the demonisation of ‘unskilled’ immigration
Policymakers' hero worship of "skilled" immigration has failed - blog by HPC Executive Director, Luke Hildyard for Left Foot Forward